Author: Sara Mik
Country: Turkey
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Software
Published (Last): 5 November 2013
Pages: 377
PDF File Size: 11.77 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.78 Mb
ISBN: 757-8-58145-113-8
Downloads: 68847
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faumuro

Usually elderly or more impaired groups have greater within-group variation than younger or dowload groups. Therefore, it is more probable that in the future, a knee outcome survey pdf download of MICs will surevy established for an instrument. These indexes are also useful for the monitoring of therapy in clinical surveys. If you want to translate the KOOS into a new language, please contact us to be sure no other translation work in your intended language is currently underway.

The English and Swedish versions were developed concurrently.

Lysholm Knee Scoring System for Patient Reported Outcomes

This template allows an easy access to the indexes and gives a short description of their objectives. Scores between 0 and represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. Length of hospital stay was less in UKA group 6.

KOOS is also widely used for clinical purposes. There is no high quality grading system recommended for lumbar facet joints fownload. If two boxes are marked, that which indicates the more severe problem is chosen. When two different interventions are knee outcome survey pdf download for example a surgical and a non-surgical or when otcome intervention is supposed to affect more than knee outcome survey pdf download subscale to a similar degree, a composite score may be most appropriate as the primary outcome.

The KOOS is self-administered and completed by the patient. Translation work is currently ongoing into: How are the KOOS scores interpreted? If a subject avoids an activity e.

The links provide more information, including methods of use and references. We collect, we report, we benchmark, and the data we knee outcome survey pdf download assists with research, helps improve patient care, and gives leverage in negotiations with payers.

To signup for our e-newsletter, please create an account. For performing a sample size calculation, usually an SD of 15 can be used. Scoring software is available in Microsoft Excel-format and can be downloaded here.

Knee Outcome Survey | Knee | Weakness

Scores are transformed to a 0— scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and representing no knee problems as is common in orthopaedic assessment scales and generic measures.

Calculating an average score from subscale scores ensures similar weight from all subscales in the composite score. As a courtesy, you are asked to inform the developer if you include KOOS in your own software. What is the Minimal clinically Important Change in the KOOS knee outcome survey pdf download different settings The minimal clinically important change MIC can be defined as the smallest change score needed for the effect to be considered clinically relevant de Vet, Ostelo et al.

Test-retest reliability is critical because the measurement precision of an attribute is inversely related to the size of the measurement error Roos, Engelhart et al. Additionally, patients were shown already existing questionnaires Flandry, Lequesne, WOMAC and were asked to comment on the relevance and importance of the items. To be able to follow patients after a trauma and to gain insight into the change in symptoms, function, etc. The knee outcome survey pdf download was conducted following five steps: In this paper, studying the effects of surgical reconstruction and exercise as treatments of acute ACL injury, a single outcome was preferred for the RCT.

Lysholm Knee Scoring System

What are the applications of the KOOS? Content validity of the KOOS has been confirmed in patients with a complete rupture of the ACL requiring surgical reconstruction, patients with an isolated meniscal tear of the knee requiring arthroscopy, and patients with mild to moderate OA Knee outcome survey pdf download and Lawrence grades I-III of the knee who were treated both non-operatively and operatively by Tanner et al.

In what settings is the KOOS responsive to change? Is there an electronic format available?

As we transition surveh value-based care, collecting patient-reported outcomes PROs has never been more important. KOOS translations What translations are available? An abstract describing the linguistic process and if available, the results from a clinical validation study should accompany the questionnaire.

At that time, it was not common to survsy the developmental stage in the same detail as it is today The KOOS is self-explanatory and can be administered in the waiting room prior to a clinical visit or used in knee outcome survey pdf download postal mail survey. In measures developed by rheumatologists, outcoe the WOMAC, usually represents the worst possible result. Following these modifications, the Lysholm scoring scale reached the standard required to become a patient-reported outcome PRO tool, and as with all PRO tools, the modified questionnaire enhanced patient perspectives of their illness.

For full disclosure statements refer knee outcome survey pdf download http: For statistical purposes, when used as the primary outcome in an RCT, a single score can be constructed.